If the author writes with a skeptical tone about a policy, what can you infer about their stance?

• A. They fully support the policy without reservations.
• B. They doubt the policy’s effectiveness and may require more evidence.
• C. They are indifferent to the policy’s effects.
• D. They prefer a different policy regardless of evidence.

Answer: (B)

A skeptical tone signals doubt about whether the policy will work and a desire for stronger evidence before endorsing it. When the author questions claims, points out uncertainties, or calls for more data, the stance is cautious evaluation rather than outright approval. So the correct inference is that they doubt the policy’s effectiveness and may require more evidence before supporting it. This differs from full, unreserved support, which would come with confident endorsement; from indifference, which would show neutrality rather than doubt; and from preferring a different policy, which would imply a clear alternative even in the face of evidence.